Background:
Among over 270 recognized group A streptococccal emm-types, the emm1 lineage is conventionally considered as highly invasive. It is the most frequently identified emm-type from invasive isolates in high-income countries and probably the best characterised strain. Based on a recent systematic review, we aimed to determine whether M1 is among the emm-types with the highest invasiveness ratio worldwide, which could have implications for disease control and vaccine strategies.
Methods:
We previously conducted a population-based systematic review of global emm-type and emm-cluster distributions (1990–2023), analyzing data from 212 studies across 55 countries (1). We extracted all strains associated with invasive and non-invasive manifestations and inferred relative invasiveness for each emm-type based on the proportion of non-invasive and invasive isolates. Five representative emm-types, spanning non-invasive to highly invasive profiles, were selected to assess streptococcal invasiveness.
Results:
We analyzed 175 epidemiological datasets comprising 59 798 global isolates belonging to 112 emm-types and 30 emm-clusters. Most strains came from high income settings (77.0% of isolates), with overall similar proportion among invasive (75,3%) and non-invasive isolates (79.4%). The well characterised M1 ranked 39th most invasive given it was also frequently isolated in non-invasive infections.
Conclusion
This study highlights the need for enhanced surveillance in low- and middle-income settings, where the burden of invasive disease is highest. M1 may not be the most intrinsically invasive emm-type at a worldwide population level. Including representative strains from emm-types of varying invasiveness could broaden the scope of future microbiological studies.